Morris v. Daimler Trucks North America, LLC

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois
DecidedApril 1, 2020
Docket3:20-cv-00246
StatusUnknown

This text of Morris v. Daimler Trucks North America, LLC (Morris v. Daimler Trucks North America, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morris v. Daimler Trucks North America, LLC, (S.D. Ill. 2020).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

KALEB T. MORRIS, as administrator of the Estate of Victor D. Morris,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 20-246 JPG

DAIMLER TRUCKS NORTH AMERICA, LLC,

Defendant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

In light of Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals admonitions, see Foster v. Hill, 497 F.3d 695, 696-97 (7th Cir. 2007), the Court has undertaken a rigorous initial review of pleadings to ensure that jurisdiction has been properly pled. See Hertz Corp. v. Friend, 559 U.S. 77, 94 (2010) (noting courts’ “independent obligation to determine whether subject-matter jurisdiction exists, even when no party challenges it”). The Court has noted the following defects in the jurisdictional allegations of the Complaint (Doc. 1) filed by plaintiff: Failure to allege the citizenship of decedent. A complaint asserting diversity jurisdiction must allege the citizenship of individual parties. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1). Where a suit is brought on behalf of the estate of a decedent, the citizenship of the legal representative of the estate shall be deemed to be that of the decedent. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(2); see Gustafson v. zumBrunnen, 546 F.3d 398, 400-01 (7th Cir. 2008); Konradi v. United States, 919 F.2d 1207, 1214 (7th Cir. 1990). The complaint does not allege the decedent’s citizenship prior to his death.

Failure to allege the citizenship of each member of an unincorporated association. To determine if complete diversity exists, the Court must examine the citizenship of each member of a limited liability company. See Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 185, 195-96 (1990); Belleville Catering Co. v. Champaign Market Place, LLC, 350 F.3d 691, 692 (7th Cir. 2003) (partnerships and limited liability companies are citizens of every state of which any member is a citizen); Indiana Gas Co. v. Home Ins. Co., 141 F.3d 314, 316 (7th Cir. 1998). The relevant pleading Plaintiff states Daimler Trucks North America, LLC is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Portland, Oregon but this is not enough. Plaintiff must allege each member of the LLC and their citizenship. The Court hereby ORDERS plaintiff shall have up to and including April 15, 2020

to amend the faulty pleading to correct the jurisdictional defect. See 28 U.S.C. § 1653. Failure to amend the faulty pleading may result in dismissal of this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Amendment of the faulty pleading to reflect an adequate basis for subject matter jurisdiction will satisfy this order. Plaintiff is directed to consult Local Rule 15.1 regarding amended pleadings and need not seek leave of Court to file such amended pleading. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: April 1, 2020

s/J. Phil Gilbert J. PHIL GILBERT DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hertz Corp. v. Friend
559 U.S. 77 (Supreme Court, 2010)
Carden v. Arkoma Associates
494 U.S. 185 (Supreme Court, 1990)
Indiana Gas Company, Inc. v. Home Insurance Company
141 F.3d 314 (Seventh Circuit, 1998)
Foster v. Hill
497 F.3d 695 (Seventh Circuit, 2007)
Gustafson v. Zumbrunnen
546 F.3d 398 (Seventh Circuit, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Morris v. Daimler Trucks North America, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-daimler-trucks-north-america-llc-ilsd-2020.