Morris v. Commonwealth
This text of 184 S.W.2d 993 (Morris v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion of the Court by
Affirming.
The proof that appellant stole an automobile belonging to the State, as charged in the indictment, is undisputed and conclusive; and the sole plea of his counsel is that the punishment inflicted is excessive in view -of the fact that appellant was so drunk at the time of the theft as to be incapable of entertaining a felonious intent. However, the Court instructed on the defense •of drunkenness, and the testimony of the Commonwealth was sufficient to support the jury’s adverse verdict. These circumstances, and the absence of any legal question make it apparent that we would not be warranted in extending this opinion in order to justify an obviously inescapable conclusion.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
184 S.W.2d 993, 299 Ky. 161, 1945 Ky. LEXIS 400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-commonwealth-kyctapphigh-1945.