Morris v. Clarke

Fourth Circuit

Morris v. Clarke

582 F. App'x 262

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 3, 2014·No. No. 14-6544·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Charles Robert Morris, III, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Morris v. Clarke, No. 2:14-cv-00022-RBS-DEM (E.D.Va. Mar. 31, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented' in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Charles Robert Morris, III, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Morris v. Clarke, No. 2:14-cv-00022-RBS-DEM (E.D.Va. Mar. 31, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented' in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Morris v. Clarke, 582 F. App'x 262 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

582 F. App'x 262 (Morris v. Clarke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related