Morris v. Chesapeake & O. S. S. Co.
148 F. 11, 78 C.C.A. 179, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4296
Opinion
We are satisfied that this is an entire contract, not seven separate contracts, and therefore not within the exception which admits parol evidence to show that a written contract is not a contract at all, because it never went into effect; some unexpressed condition precedent not being fulfilled.
The decree is affirmed, with interest, but without costs, upon the opinion of the district judge and the report of the commissioner.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Morris v. Chesapeake & O. S. S. Co., 148 F. 11, 78 C.C.A. 179, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4296 (2d Cir. 1906).
148 F. 11 (Morris v. Chesapeake & O. S. S. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
American Enameled Brick & Tile Co. v. Brozek
231 N.W. 45 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1930)
First Nat. Bank of Denver v. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City
6 F.2d 339 (Eighth Circuit, 1925)