Morris v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Morris v. Brown

48 P. 750, 5 Kan. App. 102, 1897 Kan. App. LEXIS 504

CourtCourt of Appeals of Kansas

DecidedApril 30, 1897

DocketNo. 186

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 48 P. 750 (Morris v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morris v. Brown, 48 P. 750, 5 Kan. App. 102, 1897 Kan. App. LEXIS 504 (kanctapp 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

McElroy, J.

We are of the opinion that the Hill judgment was a lien upon the real estate in question from the time such real estate was abandoned as a homestead by the debtor. The judgment lien, therefore, was and is, superior to the title of the plaintiff, Lillie Morris. Babcock v. Jones, 15 Kan. 296.

It follows, that the trial court committed no error in its conclusions of law, and that it properly overruled the motion for a new trial; and its judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McElroy, J.

We are of the opinion that the Hill judgment was a lien upon the real estate in question from the time such real estate was abandoned as a homestead by the debtor. The judgment lien, therefore, was and is, superior to the title of the plaintiff, Lillie Morris. Babcock v. Jones, 15 Kan. 296.

It follows, that the trial court committed no error in its conclusions of law, and that it properly overruled the motion for a new trial; and its judgment will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 P. 750, 5 Kan. App. 102, 1897 Kan. App. LEXIS 504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-brown-kanctapp-1897.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack