Morris v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Morris v. Brown

48 P. 750, 5 Kan. App. 102, 1897 Kan. App. LEXIS 504

Court of Appeals of Kansas·Decided April 30, 1897·No. No. 186·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

McElroy, J.

We are of the opinion that the Hill judgment was a lien upon the real estate in question from the time such real estate was abandoned as a homestead by the debtor. The judgment lien, therefore, was and is, superior to the title of the plaintiff, Lillie Morris. Babcock v. Jones, 15 Kan. 296.

It follows, that the trial court committed no error in its conclusions of law, and that it properly overruled the motion for a new trial; and its judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McElroy, J.

We are of the opinion that the Hill judgment was a lien upon the real estate in question from the time such real estate was abandoned as a homestead by the debtor. The judgment lien, therefore, was and is, superior to the title of the plaintiff, Lillie Morris. Babcock v. Jones, 15 Kan. 296.

It follows, that the trial court committed no error in its conclusions of law, and that it properly overruled the motion for a new trial; and its judgment will be affirmed.

Morris v. Brown, 48 P. 750, 5 Kan. App. 102, 1897 Kan. App. LEXIS 504 (kanctapp 1897).

Pincite

48 P. 750 (Morris v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related