Morris v. Briggs
This text of 57 Mass. 342 (Morris v. Briggs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court are of opinion, that, on the facts reported by the auditor, the plaintiff’s books were competent evidence, and that the plaintiff is entitled to recover, according to the verdict, for the larger sum reported by the auditor: Also, that no execution issue on this judgment, but that a certificate go, &c., stating the several sums recovered as debt and costs, which are to be allowed as a debt proved by the plaintiff, under proceedings in insolvency, against the defendant, and the costs to be j>aid in full.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
57 Mass. 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-briggs-mass-1849.