Morris v. Barker
This text of 4 Del. 520 (Morris v. Barker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
But the court admitted the evidence, in mitigation of damages, on the authority of Leicester vs. Walter, 2 Camp. 251; and - vs. Moore, 1 M. & S. 284; and it seemed to them reasonable, that although a man may not justify the uttering a slander, nor attempt to prove its truth upon a plea of not guilty, yet with a view to mitigate the damages and disprove malice, he might show that before the uttering the slander by the defendant, it was generally reported and spoken of by others.’ Verdict for plaintiff $200.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 Del. 520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-barker-delsuperct-1847.