Morris v. Auld

255 S.W. 253
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 11, 1923
DocketNo. 5.
StatusPublished

This text of 255 S.W. 253 (Morris v. Auld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morris v. Auld, 255 S.W. 253 (Tex. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

BARCUS, J.

This is an appeal from the county court of Limestone county, the case having been originally filed in the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fifth Supreme Judicial District and by that court transferred to this court.

An inspection of the record fails to disclose that any notice of appeal was given by the plaintiff in error in the lower court. In the absence of such notice, the appellate court acquires no jurisdiction of the cause, and the appeal is therefore dismissed. Article 2084, Revised Statutes of Texas; Western Union Telegraph Co. v. O’Keefe, 87 Tex. 823, 28 S. W. 945; Smithwick v. Kelly, 79 Tex. 564, 15 S. W. 486; Beaumont v. Newsome (Tex. Civ. App.) 143 S. W. 941; Beversdorff v. Dienger (Tex. Civ. App.) 141 S. W. 533; Goldman v. Broyles (Tex. Civ. App.) 141 S. W. 283; Eclipse Paint & Mfg. Co. v. New Process Roofing & Supply Co., 55 Tex. Civ. App. 553, 120 S. W. 532.

SPIVEY, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goldman v. Broyles
141 S.W. 283 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1911)
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. O'Keefe
28 S.W. 945 (Texas Supreme Court, 1894)
Beversdorff v. Dienger
141 S.W. 533 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1911)
Eclipse Paint & Manufacturing Co. v. New Process Roofing & Supply Co.
120 S.W. 532 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1909)
Smithwick v. Kelly
15 S.W. 486 (Texas Supreme Court, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
255 S.W. 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-auld-texapp-1923.