Morris Steinberg v. J. L. Dorfman and Sol Schoeman
This text of 356 F.2d 471 (Morris Steinberg v. J. L. Dorfman and Sol Schoeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order of the district court affirming the referee’s order denying Stein-berg a discharge in bankruptcy is affirmed.
The referee heard the testimony of the bankrupt concerning the inadequacy of his books and his explanation as to the disappearance of money which had been in the bankrupt’s hands. Obviously the referee disbelieved much, or a portion, of the attempted explanation.
We are not persuaded from our review of the record that the referee was mistaken. Thus, we cannot say his determination was clearly erroneous.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
356 F.2d 471, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 7287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-steinberg-v-j-l-dorfman-and-sol-schoeman-ca9-1966.