Morris Riddick, Jr. v. Edward W. Murray, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections

848 F.2d 185, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 7004, 1988 WL 54169
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 26, 1988·No. 87-7595·Unpublished

Opinion

848 F.2d 185
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Morris RIDDICK, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY, Director of the Virginia Department of
Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 87-7595.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 29, 1988.
Decided: May 26, 1988.

Morris Riddick, Jr., appellant pro se.

Katherine Baldwin Toone (Office of the Attorney General), for appellee.

Before JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Morris Riddick, Jr. seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Riddick v. Murray, C/A No. 86-865-N (E.D.Va. Apr. 20, 1987). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morris Riddick, Jr. v. Edward W. Murray, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, 848 F.2d 185, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 7004, 1988 WL 54169 (4th Cir. 1988).

848 F.2d 185 (Morris Riddick, Jr. v. Edward W. Murray, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Patel by Patel v. Dyar
848 F.2d 185 (Fourth Circuit, 1988)