Morris Pumps v. Centerline Piping, Inc.

740 N.W.2d 299
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 31, 2007
Docket133013
StatusPublished

This text of 740 N.W.2d 299 (Morris Pumps v. Centerline Piping, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morris Pumps v. Centerline Piping, Inc., 740 N.W.2d 299 (Mich. 2007).

Opinion

740 N.W.2d 299 (2007)

MORRIS PUMPS, a division of Yeomans Chicago Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
CENTERLINE PIPING, INC., Defendant, and
EBI-Detroit, Inc., a/k/a EBI Detroit, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.
R. Vander Lind & Son, Inc., and Chemineer, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, and
Robbins & Meyers, Inc., Plaintiff,
v.
Centerline Piping, Inc., Defendant, and
EBI-Detroit, Inc., a/k/a EBI Detroit, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.

Docket Nos. 133013, 133014. COA Nos. 268717, 268718.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

October 31, 2007.

On order of the Court, the motion for leave to file brief amicus curiae is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the December 12, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
740 N.W.2d 299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-pumps-v-centerline-piping-inc-mich-2007.