Morris Plan Industrial Bank v. Rives

180 Misc. 495, 44 N.Y.S.2d 745, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2509
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedMay 11, 1943
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 180 Misc. 495 (Morris Plan Industrial Bank v. Rives) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morris Plan Industrial Bank v. Rives, 180 Misc. 495, 44 N.Y.S.2d 745, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2509 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).

Opinion

Memorandum Per Curiam.

It is not conclusively shown that the facts here were such as were or could have been litigated in the prior action.

Even though body execution may not issue and discharge in bankruptcy may be speculative, as defendant says, she has not shown that the substance of any of her rights or interests established in the first action will be destroyed or impaired in the prosecution of the second. (Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. Nieberg Realty Corp., 250 N. Y. 304.)

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.

Hammer, Shientag and Hecht, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Winter v. Schwartz
33 Misc. 2d 1061 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Industrial Bank of Commerce v. Selling
203 Misc. 154 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
180 Misc. 495, 44 N.Y.S.2d 745, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-plan-industrial-bank-v-rives-nyappterm-1943.