Morris Plan Industrial Bank v. Rives
This text of 180 Misc. 495 (Morris Plan Industrial Bank v. Rives) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is not conclusively shown that the facts here were such as were or could have been litigated in the prior action.
Even though body execution may not issue and discharge in bankruptcy may be speculative, as defendant says, she has not shown that the substance of any of her rights or interests established in the first action will be destroyed or impaired in the prosecution of the second. (Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. Nieberg Realty Corp., 250 N. Y. 304.)
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.
Hammer, Shientag and Hecht, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
180 Misc. 495, 44 N.Y.S.2d 745, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-plan-industrial-bank-v-rives-nyappterm-1943.