Morris Plan Industrial Bank v. Kraemer
This text of 243 A.D. 632 (Morris Plan Industrial Bank v. Kraemer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order directing plaintiff upon payment by respondent of the full amount of the judgment to execute and deliver an assignment of the judgment reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Respondent and others are comakers of a promissory note. By paying the amount due the judgment thereby becomes extinguished and respondent would be entitled to a satisfaction of the judgment but not to an assignment of it. (Townsend v. Whitney, 75 N. Y, 425, 429; Gotthelf v. Krulewitch, 153 App. Div. 746, 748.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
243 A.D. 632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-plan-industrial-bank-v-kraemer-nyappdiv-1935.