Morris Philip and K & J Trading Corp. v. Wildman Jacquard Company
This text of 337 F.2d 382 (Morris Philip and K & J Trading Corp. v. Wildman Jacquard Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
337 F.2d 382
143 U.S.P.Q. 172
Morris PHILIP and K & J Trading Corp., Appellants,
v.
WILDMAN JACQUARD COMPANY.
No. 14812.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued Oct. 6, 1964.
Decided Oct. 23, 1964.
W. Brown Morton, Jr., McLean & Dibble, Washington, D.C. (John T. Roberts, Washington, D.C. Sigmund H. Steinberg, Steinberg, Richman, Price & Steinbrook, Philadelphia, Pa., Pennie, Edmonds, Morton, Taylor & Adams, New York City, of counsel, on the brief), for plaintiffs-appellants.
Henry N. Paul, Jr., Paul & Paul, Philadelphia, Pa. (John H. Austin, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for defendant-appellee.
Before KALODNER, GANEY and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
On review of the record we find no error. The Judgment of the District Court will be affirmed for the reasons so well stated by Judge Kirkpatrick in his Opinion reported at 225 F.Supp. 955 (1963).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
337 F.2d 382, 143 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 172, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 4077, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-philip-and-k-j-trading-corp-v-wildman-jacqu-ca3-1964.