Morris Philip and K & J Trading Corp. v. Wildman Jacquard Company

337 F.2d 382, 143 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 172, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 4077
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided October 23, 1964·No. 14812·Published

Opinion

337 F.2d 382

143 U.S.P.Q. 172

Morris PHILIP and K & J Trading Corp., Appellants,
v.
WILDMAN JACQUARD COMPANY.

No. 14812.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Oct. 6, 1964.
Decided Oct. 23, 1964.

W. Brown Morton, Jr., McLean & Dibble, Washington, D.C. (John T. Roberts, Washington, D.C. Sigmund H. Steinberg, Steinberg, Richman, Price & Steinbrook, Philadelphia, Pa., Pennie, Edmonds, Morton, Taylor & Adams, New York City, of counsel, on the brief), for plaintiffs-appellants.

Henry N. Paul, Jr., Paul & Paul, Philadelphia, Pa. (John H. Austin, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for defendant-appellee.

Before KALODNER, GANEY and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On review of the record we find no error. The Judgment of the District Court will be affirmed for the reasons so well stated by Judge Kirkpatrick in his Opinion reported at 225 F.Supp. 955 (1963).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morris Philip and K & J Trading Corp. v. Wildman Jacquard Company, 337 F.2d 382, 143 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 172, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 4077 (3d Cir. 1964).

337 F.2d 382 (Morris Philip and K & J Trading Corp. v. Wildman Jacquard Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morris Philip & K & J Trading Corp. v. Wildman Jasquard Co.
225 F. Supp. 955 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1963)