Morris P. Kirk & Son, Inc. v. United States

33 Cust. Ct. 352
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedSeptember 9, 1954
DocketNo. 58366; protests 161576-K, 164604-K (B), and 164605-K (Los Angeles)
StatusPublished

This text of 33 Cust. Ct. 352 (Morris P. Kirk & Son, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morris P. Kirk & Son, Inc. v. United States, 33 Cust. Ct. 352 (cusc 1954).

Opinion

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of zinc the same in all material respects as that passed upon in M. W. Zack Metal Company v. United States (26 Cust. Ct. 91, C. D. 1306), which the court held to be classifiable under paragraph 397 as articles in chief value of zinc, not specially [353]*353provided for. However, inasmuch as the plaintiff in the cited case did not claim classification under paragraph 397, the protest therein was overruled without affirming the collector’s classification. On the record presented herein, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

M. W. Zack Metal Co. v. United States
26 Cust. Ct. 91 (U.S. Customs Court, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 Cust. Ct. 352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-p-kirk-son-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1954.