Morris National, Inc. v. Adams & Brooks, Inc.

Federal Circuit

Morris National, Inc. v. Adams & Brooks, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedSeptember 17, 2014

Docket14-1224

StatusUnpublished

This text of Morris National, Inc. v. Adams & Brooks, Inc. (Morris National, Inc. v. Adams & Brooks, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morris National, Inc. v. Adams & Brooks, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

MORRIS NATIONAL, INC., Appellant,

v.

ADAMS & BROOKS, INC., Appellee. ______________________

2014-1224 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 92052158. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

ELLIOT B. GIPSON, Fayer Gipson LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was PHU NGUYEN.

BASSAM N. IBRAHIM, Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief was BRYCE J. MAYNARD. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (CHEN, LINN, and HUGHES, Circuit Judg- es). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

September 17, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI