Morris May v. Warner Amex Cable Communications Virgil Reed, President of Wacci Patricia Morrison, Vice President and Legal Counsel of Wacci

836 F.2d 1348, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 284, 1988 WL 1356
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 13, 1988
Docket87-3961
StatusUnpublished

This text of 836 F.2d 1348 (Morris May v. Warner Amex Cable Communications Virgil Reed, President of Wacci Patricia Morrison, Vice President and Legal Counsel of Wacci) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morris May v. Warner Amex Cable Communications Virgil Reed, President of Wacci Patricia Morrison, Vice President and Legal Counsel of Wacci, 836 F.2d 1348, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 284, 1988 WL 1356 (6th Cir. 1988).

Opinion

836 F.2d 1348

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Morris MAY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
WARNER AMEX CABLE COMMUNICATIONS; Virgil Reed, President of
Wacci; Patricia Morrison, Vice President and
Legal Counsel of Wacci, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 87-3961.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Jan. 13, 1988.

Before ENGEL and RYAN, Circuit Judges, and GEORGE CLIFTON EDWARDS, Jr., Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

The defendants move to dismiss and the plaintiff moves to expedite this appeal from the district court's order denying class certification in this civil rights case. 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. In the district court, the plaintiff filed a complaint alleging religious and racial discrimination. He requested class certification. The district court entered an order denying class certification.

The district court clerk's office mistakenly sent the plaintiff a judgment entry dismissing the case. It subsequently sent him a letter indicating that the judgment entry was in error. However, the plaintiff had already filed a notice of appeal.

It is clear that the district court's order only refused class certification. An order refusing class certification is not a final order. Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay, 437 U.S. 463, 467 (1978). Therefore, this court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal.

The motion to dismiss is granted. The motion to expedite the appeal is denied as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay
437 U.S. 463 (Supreme Court, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
836 F.2d 1348, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 284, 1988 WL 1356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-may-v-warner-amex-cable-communications-virgil-reed-president-of-ca6-1988.