Morris May v. Pro Guard, Inc.

Sixth Circuit

Morris May v. Pro Guard, Inc.

837 F.2d 476, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 478, 1988 WL 3480

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 19, 1988

Docket87-5861

StatusUnpublished

This text of 837 F.2d 476 (Morris May v. Pro Guard, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morris May v. Pro Guard, Inc., 837 F.2d 476, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 478, 1988 WL 3480 (6th Cir. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

837 F.2d 476

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Morris MAY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PRO GUARD, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 87-5861.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Jan. 19, 1988.

Before MERRITT, CORNELIA G. KENNEDY and KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This appeal has been referred to this panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Plaintiff appeals the district court's judgment overruling plaintiff's objections to appointment of a master pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 53.

An order of reference by a district court to a master is generally interlocutory and not appealable. See Deckert v. Independence Corp., 311 U.S. 282, 291 n. 4 (1940).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the appeal be dismissed pursuant to Rule 9(b)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI