Morris May v. Pro Guard, Inc.

837 F.2d 476, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 478, 1988 WL 3480
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided January 19, 1988·No. 87-5861·Unpublished

Opinion

837 F.2d 476

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Morris MAY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PRO GUARD, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 87-5861.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Jan. 19, 1988.

Before MERRITT, CORNELIA G. KENNEDY and KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This appeal has been referred to this panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Plaintiff appeals the district court's judgment overruling plaintiff's objections to appointment of a master pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 53.

An order of reference by a district court to a master is generally interlocutory and not appealable. See Deckert v. Independence Corp., 311 U.S. 282, 291 n. 4 (1940).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the appeal be dismissed pursuant to Rule 9(b)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morris May v. Pro Guard, Inc., 837 F.2d 476, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 478, 1988 WL 3480 (6th Cir. 1988).

837 F.2d 476 (Morris May v. Pro Guard, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Deckert v. Independence Shares Corp.
311 U.S. 282 (Supreme Court, 1940)