Morris, Kevin Ray Sr.
This text of Morris, Kevin Ray Sr. (Morris, Kevin Ray Sr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-92,608-01
EX PARTE KEVIN MORRIS, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 19244A IN THE 2ND DISTRICT COURT FROM CHEROKEE COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant was convicted of eleven counts of aggravated sexual assault of a child, ten counts
of sexual assault of a child, and thirteen counts of indecency with a child. He was sentenced to life
imprisonment on each of the aggravated sexual assault counts, twenty years’ imprisonment on the
sexual assault counts, twenty years’ imprisonment on twelve of the indecency counts, and ten years’
on the last indecency count. The Twelfth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Morris v. State,
No. 12-17-00124-CR (Tex App.—Tyler Dec. 4, 2018)(not designated for publication). Applicant
filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk
forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends that trial counsel was ineffective by failing to raise a statute of limitations 2
defense on numerous counts, failing to object to the prosecutor eliciting statements regarding a
familial argument, opening the door to harmful testimony, failing to object to the prosecutor’s
opening statement which mentioned other victims, and failing to object to numerous extraneous
offenses. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v.
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is
the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).
The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims. In developing the
record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to
hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants
to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing.
See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall
immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.
The trial court shall make findings stating the birth dates of the complainants in all of the
counts for which Applicant challenges the statute of limitations. The trial court shall make findnigs
as to whether the statute of limitations had run before the indictment of any of the thirty-four counts
of the indictment. The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether
trial counsel’s performance was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court may make
any other findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from 3
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
Filed: May 12, 2021 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Morris, Kevin Ray Sr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-kevin-ray-sr-texcrimapp-2021.