Morris Johnson v. United States
This text of Morris Johnson v. United States (Morris Johnson v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________
No. 96-2789 ___________
Morris Lynn Johnson, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. United States of America, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * ___________
Submitted: March 4, 1997
Filed: March 10, 1997 ___________
Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges. ___________
PER CURIAM.
Morris Johnson appeals from the district court's1 order dismissing without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction his motion to expunge or correct records of the Bureau of Prisons and the United States Parole Commission. Reviewing de novo, we conclude that Johnson's motion was properly construed as an attack on the execution of his sentence, and as such, is cognizable in a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition filed in a court with jurisdiction over Johnson's present custodian. See Bell v. United States, 48 F.3d 1042, 1043-44 (8th Cir. 1995); Schneider v. United
The HONORABLE DAVID S. DOTY, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. States, 27 F.3d 1327, 1331 (8th Cir. 1994) (standard of review), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 723 (1995). As Johnson is incarcerated in
-2- Illinois, his petition was not properly filed in the District of Minnesota. Accordingly, we affirm.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-3-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Morris Johnson v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-johnson-v-united-states-ca8-1997.