Morris Erbesh NNE, Inc. v. Schwartz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Morris Erbesh NNE, Inc. v. Schwartz

52 A.D.3d 791, 859 N.Y.S.2d 386

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 24, 2008

StatusPublished

This text of 52 A.D.3d 791 (Morris Erbesh NNE, Inc. v. Schwartz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morris Erbesh NNE, Inc. v. Schwartz, 52 A.D.3d 791, 859 N.Y.S.2d 386 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, for specific performance of an option contained in a [792]*792lease to purchase real property, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rudolph, J.), dated December 14, 2006, which, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the first cause of action insofar as it was for specific performance.

Motion by the respondents to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the appeal is academic.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the argument of the appeal, it is

Ordered that the motion is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

We agree with the respondents that the closing on the subject property in December 2007 rendered this appeal academic. Rivera, J.P, Santucci, Dickerson and Belen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI