Morris-Crawley v. Rapoport

224 A.D.2d 208, 637 N.Y.S.2d 145, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 951

This text of 224 A.D.2d 208 (Morris-Crawley v. Rapoport) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morris-Crawley v. Rapoport, 224 A.D.2d 208, 637 N.Y.S.2d 145, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 951 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered on or about January 6,1994, which granted defendants’ motion for disclosure sanctions to the extent of precluding plaintiff from introducing evidence of her decedent’s lost earnings, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The preclusion order was justified by plaintiff’s failure to comply with a prior order directing her to provide defendants with the IRS forms authorizing release of the decedent’s tax returns for the years 1982 to the present (Glasburgh v Port Auth., 193 AD2d 441). Plaintiff’s remaining arguments urging various procedural irregularities are both unpreserved and without merit. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Wallach, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Glasburgh v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey
193 A.D.2d 441 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
224 A.D.2d 208, 637 N.Y.S.2d 145, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 951, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-crawley-v-rapoport-nyappdiv-1996.