Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Morris Construction Co. v. Randolph

Morris Construction Co. v. Randolph

135 S.E. 72, 163 Ga. 6, 1926 Ga. LEXIS 5
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 13, 1926
DocketNo. 5305
StatusPublished

This text of 135 S.E. 72 (Morris Construction Co. v. Randolph) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morris Construction Co. v. Randolph, 135 S.E. 72, 163 Ga. 6, 1926 Ga. LEXIS 5 (Ga. 1926).

Opinions

I-IlLt, J.

The petition as amended alleged a cause of action; and the court did not err in overruling the general and special demurrers to the petition as amended. See Civil Code (1910), §§ 4629, 4571; Hall v. Lockerman, 127 Ga. 537 (56 S. E. 759).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Beck, P. J., who dissents. Davie & Reid and Morris, Hawkins & Wallace, for plaintiff in error. Ddgar B. Dunlap and Luther Roberts, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hall v. Lockerman
56 S.E. 759 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)
Bank of Doerun v. Fain
98 S.E. 467 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 S.E. 72, 163 Ga. 6, 1926 Ga. LEXIS 5, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-construction-co-v-randolph-ga-1926.