Morris Construction Co. v. Randolph

135 S.E. 72, 163 Ga. 6, 1926 Ga. LEXIS 5
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 13, 1926·No. No. 5305·Published

Opinions

I-IlLt, J.

The petition as amended alleged a cause of action; and the court did not err in overruling the general and special demurrers to the petition as amended. See Civil Code (1910), §§ 4629, 4571; Hall v. Lockerman, 127 Ga. 537 (56 S. E. 759).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Beck, P. J., who dissents. Davie & Reid and Morris, Hawkins & Wallace, for plaintiff in error. Ddgar B. Dunlap and Luther Roberts, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morris Construction Co. v. Randolph, 135 S.E. 72, 163 Ga. 6, 1926 Ga. LEXIS 5 (Ga. 1926).

135 S.E. 72 (Morris Construction Co. v. Randolph) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hall v. Lockerman
56 S.E. 759 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)
Bank of Doerun v. Fain
98 S.E. 467 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1919)