Morris Canal & Banking Co. v. New Jersey Zinc & Iron Co.
47 N.J. Eq. 598
Opinion
Decree affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Magie, Reed, Scudder, Van Syckel, Brown, Smith, Whitaker — 10.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Morris Canal & Banking Co. v. New Jersey Zinc & Iron Co., 47 N.J. Eq. 598 (N.J. Ct. App. 1890).
47 N.J. Eq. 598 (Morris Canal & Banking Co. v. New Jersey Zinc & Iron Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dickinson v. FUND FOR SUPPORT OF FREE PUB. SCH.
454 A.2d 491 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1982)
State v. Maas & Waldstein Co.
199 A.2d 248 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1964)
River Development Corp. v. Liberty Corp.
144 A.2d 180 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1958)
NJ Highway Authority v. Johnson
113 A.2d 831 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Bailey v. Driscoll
112 A.2d 3 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)