Morris Canal & Banking Co. v. New Jersey Zinc & Iron Co.
47 N.J. Eq. 598
This text of 47 N.J. Eq. 598 (Morris Canal & Banking Co. v. New Jersey Zinc & Iron Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Morris Canal & Banking Co. v. New Jersey Zinc & Iron Co., 47 N.J. Eq. 598 (N.J. Ct. App. 1890).
Opinion
Decree affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Magie, Reed, Scudder, Van Syckel, Brown, Smith, Whitaker — 10.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Dickinson v. FUND FOR SUPPORT OF FREE PUB. SCH.
454 A.2d 491 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1982)
State v. Maas & Waldstein Co.
199 A.2d 248 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1964)
River Development Corp. v. Liberty Corp.
144 A.2d 180 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1958)
NJ Highway Authority v. Johnson
113 A.2d 831 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Bailey v. Driscoll
112 A.2d 3 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
47 N.J. Eq. 598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-canal-banking-co-v-new-jersey-zinc-iron-co-njch-1890.