Morris Canal & Banking Co. v. Diamond Mills Paper Co.
75 A. 1101, 73 N.J. Eq. 414, 3 Buchanan 414, 1907 N.J. LEXIS 349
This text of 75 A. 1101 (Morris Canal & Banking Co. v. Diamond Mills Paper Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Morris Canal & Banking Co. v. Diamond Mills Paper Co., 75 A. 1101, 73 N.J. Eq. 414, 3 Buchanan 414, 1907 N.J. LEXIS 349 (N.J. 1907).
Opinion
The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Pitney.
For affirmance — Ti-ie Ohiep-Justioe, Garrison, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Reed, Trenchard, Bogert, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill — 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
75 A. 1101, 73 N.J. Eq. 414, 3 Buchanan 414, 1907 N.J. LEXIS 349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-canal-banking-co-v-diamond-mills-paper-co-nj-1907.