MORRIS-BEY v. State

320 S.W.3d 741, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1265, 2010 WL 3682103
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 21, 2010·No. ED 94451·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Jerome Morris-Bey, appeals the motion court’s order denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORRIS-BEY v. State, 320 S.W.3d 741, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1265, 2010 WL 3682103 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

320 S.W.3d 741 (MORRIS-BEY v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Davenport
320 S.W.3d 741 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)