Morris-Bey v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Morris-Bey v. State

844 S.W.2d 505, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1700, 1992 WL 321412

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 10, 1992·No. No. 61564·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court did not clearly err in such denial. Therefore, we affirm the motion court’s decision pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion in this case. The parties have been provided with a [506]*506memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court did not clearly err in such denial. Therefore, we affirm the motion court’s decision pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion in this case. The parties have been provided with a [506]*506memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Morris-Bey v. State, 844 S.W.2d 505, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1700, 1992 WL 321412 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

844 S.W.2d 505 (Morris-Bey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.