Morrill v. Warner

29 A. 412, 66 N.H. 572
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedJune 5, 1891
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 29 A. 412 (Morrill v. Warner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morrill v. Warner, 29 A. 412, 66 N.H. 572 (N.H. 1891).

Opinion

Carpenter, J.

The exceptions present no question of law. Whether justice required that the trial should be stopped, and whether, by reason of the proximity of the places, proof of the state of the weather in one town had a tendency to show what it was in the other, were questions of fact to be determined at the trial term. Temple v. Sumner, Smith (N. H.) 226 ; State v. Howard, 17 N. H. 171, 186; Wentworth v. Jefferson, 60 N. H. 158 ; Norton v. Wilbur, 5 Gray 7; State v. Boston & Maine Railroad, 58 N. H. 410, 412; Amoskeag Mfg. Co. v. Head, 59 N. H. 332, 338; Tilton v. Society, 60 N. H. 377, 384; Cook v. New Durham, 64 N. H. 419; Smith v. Earle, 118 Mass. 531.

Exceptions overruled.

Blodgett, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anderson v. Aupperle
95 P. 330 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 A. 412, 66 N.H. 572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morrill-v-warner-nh-1891.