Morrill v. Warner
This text of 29 A. 412 (Morrill v. Warner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The exceptions present no question of law. Whether justice required that the trial should be stopped, and whether, by reason of the proximity of the places, proof of the state of the weather in one town had a tendency to show what it was in the other, were questions of fact to be determined at the trial term. Temple v. Sumner, Smith (N. H.) 226 ; State v. Howard, 17 N. H. 171, 186; Wentworth v. Jefferson, 60 N. H. 158 ; Norton v. Wilbur, 5 Gray 7; State v. Boston & Maine Railroad, 58 N. H. 410, 412; Amoskeag Mfg. Co. v. Head, 59 N. H. 332, 338; Tilton v. Society, 60 N. H. 377, 384; Cook v. New Durham, 64 N. H. 419; Smith v. Earle, 118 Mass. 531.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 A. 412, 66 N.H. 572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morrill-v-warner-nh-1891.