Morrill v. Warner

29 A. 412, 66 N.H. 572
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 5, 1891·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Carpenter, J.

The exceptions present no question of law. Whether justice required that the trial should be stopped, and whether, by reason of the proximity of the places, proof of the state of the weather in one town had a tendency to show what it was in the other, were questions of fact to be determined at the trial term. Temple v. Sumner, Smith (N. H.) 226 ; State v. Howard, 17 N. H. 171, 186; Wentworth v. Jefferson, 60 N. H. 158 ; Norton v. Wilbur, 5 Gray 7; State v. Boston & Maine Railroad, 58 N. H. 410, 412; Amoskeag Mfg. Co. v. Head, 59 N. H. 332, 338; Tilton v. Society, 60 N. H. 377, 384; Cook v. New Durham, 64 N. H. 419; Smith v. Earle, 118 Mass. 531.

Exceptions overruled.

Blodgett, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morrill v. Warner, 29 A. 412, 66 N.H. 572 (N.H. 1891).

29 A. 412 (Morrill v. Warner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anderson v. Aupperle
95 P. 330 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1908)