Morrill v. Lamson
138 Mass. 115, 1884 Mass. LEXIS 35
Opinion
The indorsement on the back of the writ, “ From the office of Caleb Lamson,” subjected the defendant to all the legal liabilities of an indorser of the writ, under the Pub. Sts. c. 161, § 24. Wheeler v. Lynde, 1 Allen, 402, and cases cited.
If the second rule of the Superior Court has any application to the case, which we need not decide, it furnishes no defence. The defendant cannot relieve himself from the liability he assumed by indorsing the writ, by showing that, in doing this, he violated his duty to the court. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Morrill v. Lamson, 138 Mass. 115, 1884 Mass. LEXIS 35 (Mass. 1884).
138 Mass. 115 (Morrill v. Lamson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Perkins v. Bangs
206 Mass. 408 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1910)
Johnson v. Sprague
66 N.E. 422 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1903)
Lisabelle v. Hubert
50 A. 837 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1902)