Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Morrell v. New York State Racing & Wagering Board

Morrell v. New York State Racing & Wagering Board

225 A.D.2d 627, 639 N.Y.2d 730, 639 N.Y.S.2d 730, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2689
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 11, 1996
StatusPublished

This text of 225 A.D.2d 627 (Morrell v. New York State Racing & Wagering Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morrell v. New York State Racing & Wagering Board, 225 A.D.2d 627, 639 N.Y.2d 730, 639 N.Y.S.2d 730, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2689 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the respondent’s determination is supported by substantial evidence in the record (see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit (cf., Matter of LaChance v Corbisiero, 160 AD2d 293). Thompson, J. P., Joy, Hart and Plorio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

LaChance v. Corbisiero
160 A.D.2d 293 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
225 A.D.2d 627, 639 N.Y.2d 730, 639 N.Y.S.2d 730, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morrell-v-new-york-state-racing-wagering-board-nyappdiv-1996.