Morrell v. New York State Racing & Wagering Board
225 A.D.2d 627, 639 N.Y.2d 730, 639 N.Y.S.2d 730, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2689
Opinion
Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the respondent’s determination is supported by substantial evidence in the record (see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222).
The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit (cf., Matter of LaChance v Corbisiero, 160 AD2d 293). Thompson, J. P., Joy, Hart and Plorio, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Morrell v. New York State Racing & Wagering Board, 225 A.D.2d 627, 639 N.Y.2d 730, 639 N.Y.S.2d 730, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2689 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
225 A.D.2d 627 (Morrell v. New York State Racing & Wagering Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
LaChance v. Corbisiero
160 A.D.2d 293 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)