Morphis v. Thornell

Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

9 James Morphis, No. CV-23-02589-PHX-KML

10 Petitioner, ORDER

11 v.

12 Ryan Thornell, et al.,

13 Respondents. 14 15 On August 27, 2024, Magistrate Judge Deborah M. Fine issued a Report and 16 Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending petitioner James Morphis’s motion for leave to 17 amend his petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied as untimely and futile. (Doc. 27.) 18 On August 28, 2024, Magistrate Judge Fine issued a second R&R recommending 19 Morphis’s petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied. (Doc. 28.) Morphis is represented 20 by counsel, but no objections were filed to either R&R. Therefore, the R&Rs will be 21 adopted in full. See Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003) 22 (“[D]istrict courts are not required to conduct any review at all . . . of any issue that is not 23 the subject of an objection.”). 24 Accordingly, 25 IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 27) is ADOPTED. The 26 motion for leave to amend the petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 17) is DENIED. 27 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 28) is 28 ADOPTED. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED. The Clerk of || Court shall enter a judgment of dismissal with prejudice. 2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED because || Morphis has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 4 Dated this 18th day of September, 2024. 5

5 WU plo MM. VbA Honorable Krissa M. Lanham 8 United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

_2-