Morphew v. State

155 N.E.2d 125, 239 Ind. 699, 1959 Ind. LEXIS 220
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 16, 1959
DocketNo. 0-541
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 155 N.E.2d 125 (Morphew v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morphew v. State, 155 N.E.2d 125, 239 Ind. 699, 1959 Ind. LEXIS 220 (Ind. 1959).

Opinion

Per Curiam

Petitioner herein requests “an extension of time” within which to file an appeal from the denial of a “Motion To Re-Plead” filed in the Putnam Circuit Court.

From an examination of such petition we are unable to determine whether or not petitioner has a right of appeal from the order of which he complains, nor does the petition contain matters sufficient to enable us intelligently to consider petitioner’s request. For these reasons the petition must be dismissed.

Petition dismissed.

Note.—Reported in 155 N. E. 2d 125.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. W.P., a minor
349 P.3d 181 (Court of Appeals of Alaska, 2015)
Hall v. State
984 So. 2d 278 (Court of Appeals of Mississippi, 2007)
Shewbrooks v. AC AND S. INC.
529 So. 2d 557 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1988)
On the Relation of Rosenbarger v. MAR. CC
155 N.E.2d 125 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
155 N.E.2d 125, 239 Ind. 699, 1959 Ind. LEXIS 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morphew-v-state-ind-1959.