Moroney v. State Ex Rel. Southern Surety Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Moroney v. State Ex Rel. Southern Surety Co.

1934 OK 240, 31 P.2d 608, 168 Okla. 69, 1934 Okla. LEXIS 81

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 17, 1934

Docket23496

StatusPublished

Cited by21 cases

This text of 1934 OK 240 (Moroney v. State Ex Rel. Southern Surety Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moroney v. State Ex Rel. Southern Surety Co., 1934 OK 240, 31 P.2d 608, 168 Okla. 69, 1934 Okla. LEXIS 81 (Okla. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

BUSBY, J.

The appeal in this case was filed herein April 5, 1932. In cause No. 22410, State ex rel. Southern Surety Co. v. Armstrong et al., 158 Okla. 290, 13 P. (2d) 198, there was filed a stipulation under date of April 25, 193'2, reciting and agreeing by the parties litigant that the eases numbered 22410 and 23496, which involve the same question, may be considered together.

It is therefore the order of the court that the action of the trial court be affirmed upon the authority of the opinion rendered in State ex rel. Southern Surety Co. v. Armstrong, supra.

The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed denying the writ of mandamus.

RILEY, C. J.. CULLISON, Y. C. J., and SWINDALL. McNEILL. OSBORN, BAY-LESS, and WELCH. J.T., concur. ANDREWS. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI