Mormon v. Farrell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mormon v. Farrell

228 A.D. 633

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1929

StatusPublished

This text of 228 A.D. 633 (Mormon v. Farrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mormon v. Farrell, 228 A.D. 633 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss action for failure to prosecute reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to dismiss action granted, with ten dollars costs. Plaintiff has not satisfactorily explained his neglect to prosecute this action and the discreción of the Special Term was improperly exercised. (McGee v. Levy, 215 App. Div. 720; Regan v. Milliken Bros., 123 id. 72; Lerman v. Muller, 210 id. 860.) Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Seeger and Seudder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss action for failure to prosecute reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to dismiss action granted, with ten dollars costs. Plaintiff has not satisfactorily explained his neglect to prosecute this action and the discreción of the Special Term was improperly exercised. (McGee v. Levy, 215 App. Div. 720; Regan v. Milliken Bros., 123 id. 72; Lerman v. Muller, 210 id. 860.) Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Seeger and Seudder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

228 A.D. 633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mormon-v-farrell-nyappdiv-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack