Morlock v. Hamilton
170 N.E. 140, 252 N.Y. 552, 1929 N.Y. LEXIS 623
Opinion
In each action judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion,
Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Morlock v. Hamilton, 170 N.E. 140, 252 N.Y. 552, 1929 N.Y. LEXIS 623 (N.Y. 1929).
170 N.E. 140 (Morlock v. Hamilton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Van Valkenburgh v. Bourne
26 A.D.2d 727 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1966)