Morley v. Murphy

179 Iowa 853
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided April 4, 1917·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Gaynor, C. J.

1. Boundaries : acquiescence: conflicting governmental lines. Plaintiff claims to he the owner of the east % and the defendant claims to be the owner of the west % of the NE14 of the SW% of Section 30, Township 84, Range 45, Monona County, Iowa. The controversy here involves the dividing line north and south between these two fractional parts of this forty. Hereafter, for convenience, we will call plaintiff’s land the. east 15 acres, and the defendant’s land, the west 25 acres.

Plaintiff’s father, and grantor, obtained title to this east 15 acres from C. A. McWilliams, in the fall of 1896, and moved on in .the spring of 1897, and he and his grantees have been in possession ever since. One Joseph P. Smith was the owner of the west 25 acres, and in 1896, sold it to defendant’s grantor, Mary Murphy. Smith had owned and occupied this land for 18 years prior to the sale to Mary Murphy, and the defendant and his grantors, ever since. There is no controversy between these parties as to the ownership of the fractional parts hereinbefore described. The only question now between them is as to the dividing line that separates these tracts. To divide them, there must be a line of demarcation. The line in dispute is shown in the following plat:

[855]*855

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morley v. Murphy, 179 Iowa 853 (iowa 1917).

179 Iowa 853 (Morley v. Murphy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hovendick v. Ruby
10 P.3d 1119 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 2000)
Olson v. Clark
109 N.W.2d 441 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1961)
Petrus v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad
61 N.W.2d 439 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1953)
Carstensen v. Brown
236 P. 517 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1925)
Chandler v. Hopson
188 Iowa 281 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1919)