Morley v. Eastern Express Co.

116 Mass. 97, 1874 Mass. LEXIS 30
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedOctober 28, 1874
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 116 Mass. 97 (Morley v. Eastern Express Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morley v. Eastern Express Co., 116 Mass. 97, 1874 Mass. LEXIS 30 (Mass. 1874).

Opinion

Wells, J.

There was no evidence that the box had not been delivered to Gough, according to the directions with which it was sent by the plaintiff. Giving the fullest effect to the testimony of the plaintiff, it had no more tendency to show that the box was withheld or had been lost by the defendant than by Gough. The burden in this respect was upon the plaintiff, and she failed to maintain it. Smith v. First National Bank in Westfield, 99 Mass. 605. Exceptions sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Donahue v. Leventhal
19 N.E.2d 544 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1939)
Nollman v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
131 N.E. 195 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1921)
United States Cement Co. v. Whitted
90 N.E. 481 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1910)
Evansville Metal Bed Co. v. Loge
85 N.E. 979 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
116 Mass. 97, 1874 Mass. LEXIS 30, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morley-v-eastern-express-co-mass-1874.