Morley v. Central Intelligence Agency

D.C. Circuit

Morley v. Central Intelligence Agency

599 F. App'x 1

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedFebruary 20, 2015

DocketNo. 14-5230

StatusPublished

This text of 599 F. App'x 1 (Morley v. Central Intelligence Agency) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morley v. Central Intelligence Agency, 599 F. App'x 1 (D.C. Cir. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

[2]*2 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the motion for summary affirmance, the opposition thereto, and the reply, it is

ORDERED that the motion for summary affirmance be denied. The merits of the parties’ positions are not so clear as to warrant summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C.Cir.1987) (per curiam).

Because the court has determined that summary disposition is not in order, the Clerk is instructed to calendar this case for presentation to a merits panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI