Mork v. Louis Joliet Garage Corp.

102 F.2d 994, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 2474
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedOctober 3, 1938
DocketNo. 6612
StatusPublished

This text of 102 F.2d 994 (Mork v. Louis Joliet Garage Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mork v. Louis Joliet Garage Corp., 102 F.2d 994, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 2474 (7th Cir. 1938).

Opinion

EVANS, Circuit Judge.

Now this day come the parties by their counsel, and present and file a stipulation to dismiss this appeal, which said stipulation is in the words and figures following, to wit:

“It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between Leonora.JVlork and Arthur F. Shaw, by their attorneys, Harry J. Myerson and Charles R. Aiken, Appellants in the above and foregoing appeal, and Louis Joliet Garage Corporation, Debtor, and William M. Knutson, George Blatt and A. L. Madsen, Appellees, by their attorneys, Wilhartz & Hirsch, Snapp, Heise & Snapp, and Robert W. Thomas,' that the above and foregoing appeal by Appellants may be dismissed without costs.”

On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered, adjudged and decreed by this court that this appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed, without costs, pursuant to the foregoing stipulation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 F.2d 994, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 2474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mork-v-louis-joliet-garage-corp-ca7-1938.