Moritz v. National City Co.
This text of 248 A.D. 575 (Moritz v. National City Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Orders, so far as appealed from, denying separate motions of defendants-appellants to vacate plaintiff’s notice for their examination before trial unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. The date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Dore, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
248 A.D. 575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moritz-v-national-city-co-nyappdiv-1936.