Moritz v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Moritz v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.

92 Pa. Super. 291, 1928 Pa. Super. LEXIS 10

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedNovember 16, 1927

DocketAppeal 329

StatusPublished

This text of 92 Pa. Super. 291 (Moritz v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moritz v. Florida East Coast Railway Co., 92 Pa. Super. 291, 1928 Pa. Super. LEXIS 10 (Pa. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

This appeal was argued with the case of Sabarof versus Florida East Coast Ry. Co. et al, [the same defendants and garnishee] No. 328 October Term 1927, decided this day. It raises the same questions passed on in that case and requires the same disposition.

The second assignment of error is sustained. The order of the court below discharging the rule to dissolve the attachment is reversed and the rule is reinstated and made absolute.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

This appeal was argued with the case of Sabarof versus Florida East Coast Ry. Co. et al, [the same defendants and garnishee] No. 328 October Term 1927, decided this day. It raises the same questions passed on in that case and requires the same disposition.

The second assignment of error is sustained. The order of the court below discharging the rule to dissolve the attachment is reversed and the rule is reinstated and made absolute.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 Pa. Super. 291, 1928 Pa. Super. LEXIS 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moritz-v-florida-east-coast-railway-co-pasuperct-1927.