Morisseau v. Morisseau

27 A.D.3d 651, 810 N.Y.S.2d 902
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 21, 2006·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, Charlene Morisseau appeals from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Horowitz, J.), entered February 28, 2005, which, inter alia, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding for failure to state a cause of action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

[652]*652The Family Court correctly determined that the allegations set forth in the statement attached to the subject petition failed to state a cause of action. Schmidt, J.P., Crane, Rivera and Spolzino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morisseau v. Morisseau, 27 A.D.3d 651, 810 N.Y.S.2d 902 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

27 A.D.3d 651 (Morisseau v. Morisseau) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Koska v. Koska
2024 NY Slip Op 01922 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Matter of Lori A. Janczewski v. Janczewski
2017 NY Slip Op 5601 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Cote v. Berger
112 A.D.3d 821 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Price v. Jenkins
92 A.D.3d 787 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Little v. Renz
90 A.D.3d 757 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Davis v. Venditto
45 A.D.3d 837 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)