Morisseau v. DLA Piper

Second Circuit

Morisseau v. DLA Piper

355 F. App'x 487

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided December 4, 2009·No. No. 08-0697-cv·Published

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff-Appellant Charlene Morisseau appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Kaplan, J.), entered December 4, 2007, 2007 WL 4292030, granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing the complaint; a Memorandum Opinion entered January 23, 2008, 532 F.Supp.2d 595, denying Morisseau’s motion to amend the judgment; and an order entered February 7, 2008, denying Morisseau’s motion for reconsideration. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, procedural history, and specification of issues on appeal.

We have considered all of Morisseau’s arguments on appeal and find them without merit. Therefore, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff-Appellant Charlene Morisseau appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Kaplan, J.), entered December 4, 2007, 2007 WL 4292030, granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing the complaint; a Memorandum Opinion entered January 23, 2008, 532 F.Supp.2d 595, denying Morisseau’s motion to amend the judgment; and an order entered February 7, 2008, denying Morisseau’s motion for reconsideration. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, procedural history, and specification of issues on appeal.

We have considered all of Morisseau’s arguments on appeal and find them without merit. Therefore, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Morisseau v. DLA Piper, 355 F. App'x 487 (2d Cir. 2009).

Pincite

355 F. App'x 487 (Morisseau v. DLA Piper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related