MORIN CHERFRERE v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of MORIN CHERFRERE v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA (MORIN CHERFRERE v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed November 24, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D19-2065 Lower Tribunal No. F04-9267 ________________
Morin Cherfrere, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Veronica Diaz, Judge.
McLain Law, P.A., and Matthew R. McLain (Longwood), for appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Linda Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before EMAS, LINDSEY and GORDO, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Hernandez v. State, 43 Fla. L. Weekly D1079, D1080
(Fla. 3d DCA May 16, 2018) (“The trial court’s findings of fact on the statutory
factors listed in [section 921.1402] are reviewed for the existence of
competent, substantial evidence in the record.”); Bell v. State, 313 So. 3d
1183, 1187 (Fla. 1st DCA 2021) (“On appeal, any factual findings by the trial
court which are supported by competent, substantial evidence in the record
must be affirmed, and the court’s ultimate sentencing decision is reviewed
for abuse of discretion.” (citing Jackson v. State, 276 So. 3d 73, 76 (Fla. 1st
DCA 2019))).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
MORIN CHERFRERE v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morin-cherfrere-v-the-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2021.