Morice v. Morice

Missouri Court of Appeals

Morice v. Morice

871 S.W.2d 138, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 330, 1994 WL 57690

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 1, 1994·No. No. 63963·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Father appeals the trial court’s modification of the support payments portion of a dissolution decree. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Father appeals the trial court’s modification of the support payments portion of a dissolution decree. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Morice v. Morice, 871 S.W.2d 138, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 330, 1994 WL 57690 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

871 S.W.2d 138 (Morice v. Morice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.