Moriarty v. Kent
This text of 71 Ind. 601 (Moriarty v. Kent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case turns upon the question, whether the receiver of an insolvent corporation has any authority to sue in his own name upon promissory notes executed to the corporation, in cases where there is no authority conferred by statute or by the judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction. The question is answered in the negative in the case of Garner v. Kent, 70 Ind. 428. The decision in the case referred to is in full harmony with the current weight of authority.
Judgment reversed, at costs of appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
71 Ind. 601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moriarty-v-kent-ind-1880.