Morgovsky v. Creditors' Collection Service of San Francisco

12 F.3d 1107, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 36609, 1993 WL 497226
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Morgovsky v. Creditors' Collection Service of San Francisco. Read the opinion of the Court — 92 F.3d 1193
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 29, 1993·No. 92-16563·Unpublished

Opinion

12 F.3d 1107w

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Naum MORGOVSKY and Irina Morgovsky, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CREDITORS' COLLECTION SERVICE OF SAN FRANCISCO dba Premium
Collection Service, a Corp.; Mark Love,
individually and as President of Premium
Collection Service et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-16563.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 17, 1993.*
Decided Nov. 29, 1993.

NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morgovsky v. Creditors' Collection Service of San Francisco, 12 F.3d 1107, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 36609, 1993 WL 497226 (9th Cir. 1993).

12 F.3d 1107 (Morgovsky v. Creditors' Collection Service of San Francisco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.