Morgenstern v. Andrews

569 F. App'x 158
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 29, 2014·No. No. 14-6008·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

David Morgenstern, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Morgenstern v. Andrews, No. 5:12-hc-02209-FL, 2013 WL 6239262 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 3, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this [159] court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morgenstern v. Andrews, 569 F. App'x 158 (4th Cir. 2014).

569 F. App'x 158 (Morgenstern v. Andrews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241