Morgan's Lessee v. Slider

22 Md. 267, 1864 Md. LEXIS 75
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided November 16, 1864·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Bartol, J.,

delivered the opinion of this Court.

This cause has been argued in this Court only on the part of the appellee, the appellant not having appeared or filed any brief, alleging error in the ruling of the Circuit Court upon the prayers contained in the bill of exceptions. We have carefully examined the several questions raised by the prayers, and find no error in the action of the Circuit Court. The principles of law goyerning the case, are, all of them, familiar, and well settled. We deem it unnecessary, therefore, to enter into any extended discussion of them, the grounds upon which the judgment ought to be affirmed, are clearly stated in the brief of the appellee, and fully supported hy the authorities cited by him. The judgment will therefore be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morgan's Lessee v. Slider, 22 Md. 267, 1864 Md. LEXIS 75 (Md. 1864).

22 Md. 267 (Morgan's Lessee v. Slider) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morrison v. Hammond's Lessee
27 Md. 604 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1867)