Morgan's Case

3 Md. Ch. 332
CourtHigh Court of Chancery of Maryland
DecidedMay 19, 1807
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 3 Md. Ch. 332 (Morgan's Case) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering High Court of Chancery of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morgan's Case, 3 Md. Ch. 332 (Md. Ct. App. 1807).

Opinion

Kilty, Chancellor.

John Nabb, Esquire, of Talbot county appointed trustee. To give bond in the usual form with one or more sureties to be approved by the Chancellor in the penal sum of £1,000.

This trustee gave bond as directed, and returned a schedule of the property received by him. Some time after which he died; and sundry persons by a certificate recommended William Barwick as his successor.

4th September, 1810.

Kilty, Chancellor.—

Ordered, that William Barwick be and he is hereby appointed trustee for Charles Morgan a lunatic; Provided, that before he acts as such or takes into his possession any of the property he give bond as directed in the original order.

This trustee gave bond accordingly; and, after some time, informed the Chancellor by letter, that he could not act as trustee any longer.

23d December, 1811.

The trustee having declined to act longer in this case; it is Ordered, that James JVabb be appointed trustee in his place. Bond to be given as the former trustee was directed.

This trustee gave bond as required, and returned several accounts of his receipts and disbursements of the rents and profits of the lunatic’s estate ; the first of which left a balance of $200 due to the trustee; the second left no balance either way; the third shewed a balance of $35 due to the trustee; and the fourth s.bewed a balance due him of $45. After which this trustee communicated to the Chancellor his determination to relinquish his trust. And George W. JVabb was recommended as his successor.

13th June, 1820.

Ordered, that George W. Nabb be and he is hereby appointed trustee in the place of [334]*334James Nabb, resigned. The said trustee to execute a bond with surety as was done by the former trustee, after which a further order will be made.

After this trustee had given bond as required, the former trustee returned a further account shewing a balance due him of $25. And this trustee filed an account in which he charged himself with an amount of rents and profits received more than equal to the maintenance of the lunatic. This trustee by a letter addressed to the Chancellor declined to act any longer, and recommended Charles Nabb as his successor.

19th January, 1824.

Johnson, Chancellor.—

Ordered, that Charles Nabb, of Talbot county, be and he is hereby appointed trustee in the place of George W. JYabb, resigned. The trustee now appointed to give a bond with surety as was done by the last trustee.

Charles Nabb declined the acceptance of the trust, and recommended Thomas M. Cooper, the nearest of kin to the lunatic, as a suitable person to be appointed.

22d May, 1823.

Ordered,, that Thomas M. Cooper be and he is hereby appointed trustee in place of Charles Nabb, resigned. The trustee at this time appointed to give bond for the performance of the trust as before directed to be given by the former trustee.

It does not appear, that the trustee Cooper, ever gave bond as required. The former trustee George W. JYabb filed his account from which it appeared, that there was a balance of $10 due to him.

Charles Morgan, the lunatic, by his petition, filed on the 17th of June, 1829, complained of the mismanagement of the trustee Cooper, and of his not having provided him with a comfortable subsistence from the proceeds of his estate, which was amply sufficient for that purpose; and alleged, that although he had been «officially found a lunatic some time past; yet he could produce certificates of many respectable persons, who now thought otherwise. Whereupon he prayed, that he might be either restored to the full possession and enjoyment of his property; or that another •trustee might be appointed in place of Cooper, &c. With this •petition there were a number of certificates and letters filed, from respectable citizens of Talbot county, expressing various, different, and opposite opinions as to the then mental condition of Charles Morgan.

[335]*33518th June, 1829.

Bland, Chancellor.

The petition of Charles Morgan, together with the opinions in writing of sundry persons, as to his capacity to manage his own affairs, having been submitted, were read and considered.

Charles Morgan himself did not appear, as would seem to have been his intention from what is said in one of the letters filed. But if he had, it is most likely I should not have been better enabled to have ascertained the regularity and strength of his mental faculties by a short personal interview, than from the various opinions which have been thus given to me of him. It is not easy to make up a correct judgment on such a matter,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nelson v. Close
127 A. 751 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Md. Ch. 332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morgans-case-mdch-1807.